International News | Al Jazeera America

News Live Blog

International News

Breaking news and analysis on international issues from Al Jazeera America and around the Web.

  • French foreign minister Laurent Fabius gave no details as he left a meeting of foreign ministers early Sunday in a fifth day of talks. An announcement is expected shortly.

  • Iranians are so happy it almost feels like when the football team made it to the World Cup. Social Media full of happy comments.
  • .@BarackObama will speak at @WhiteHouse about #Iran deal at 10:15 p.m.
  • Breaking: Tonight at 10:15PM ET, POTUS will deliver a statement on Iran from the State Dining Room. Watch at
  • There will be a signing at the Palais and a statement read by Lady Ashton, American sources day. Kerry will then head to press centre.
  • President Barack Obama meets in the Oval Office with Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, and Deputy National Security Advisors Tony Blinken and Ben Rhodes, to discuss ongoing negotiations with Iran, Saturday, Nov. 23, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

  • Iranian people's vote for #moderation & constructive engagement + tireless efforts by negotiating teams are to open new horizons. #IranTalks
  • Senior WH official: President Obama will call PM Netanyahu today and speak to him about Iran nuclear deal
  • House Speaker John Boehner has released a statement on the nuclear deal with Iran: 

    “The interim deal has been and will continue to be met with healthy skepticism and hard questions, not just of the Iranians, but of ourselves and our allies involved in the negotiations.  Iran has a history of obfuscation that demands verification of its activities and places the burden on the regime to prove it is upholding its obligations in good faith while a final deal is pursued.

    “The Administration and its negotiating partners claim that a final deal can be completed that affirms Iran does not have a right to enrich and permanently and irreversibly dismantles the infrastructure of its uranium and plutonium nuclear programs.  That is a goal the House shares.  The lingering question, however, is whether the negotiating partners will work equally hard to preserve the strong international sanctions regime until that goal is achieved.  Otherwise, we will look back on the interim deal as a remarkably clever Iranian move to dismantle the international sanctions regime while maintaining its infrastructure and material to pursue a break-out nuclear capability.

    The House looks forward to the Administration providing a briefing on the interim deal and the next steps.”

  • The office of the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon released a statement on Nov. 23 on the interim deal:

    New York, 23 November 2013 - Statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on the nuclear programme of Iran

    The Secretary-General warmly welcomes the interim agreement that has been reached in Geneva this night regarding the nuclear programme of Iran.

    He congratulates the negotiators for the progress made in what could turn out to be the beginnings of a historic agreement for the peoples and nations of the Middle East region and beyond.

    He urges the Governments concerned to do everything possible to build on this encouraging start, creating mutual confidence and allowing continued negotiations to extend the scope of this initial agreement.  The Secretary-General reaffirms his unswerving commitment to strengthening nuclear disarmament and the non-proliferation regime.

    The Secretary-General calls on all members of the international community to support this process which, if allowed to succeed, is likely to be to the long-term benefit of all parties.

  • Israel's Netanyahu has said he is sending his national security adviser to Washington for talks with the United States on a final deal with Iran, according to Reuters.
  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday he would soon send a team led by his national security adviser to Washington for talks with the United States on a final nuclear deal with Iran.

    "I spoke last night with President Obama. We agreed that in the coming days an Israeli team led by the national security adviser, Yossi Cohen, will go out to discuss with the United States the permanent accord with Iran," he said in public remarks to members of his Likud party.

    "This accord must bring about one outcome: the dismantling of Iran's military nuclear capability," said Netanyahu, who has described Sunday's interim deal between world powers and Iran as a historic mistake.

  • Reuters has a special report on the interim Iran nuclear deal entitled "'Great Satan' meets 'Axis of Evil' and strikes a deal"

    From Reuters: 

    Saturday night had turned into Sunday morning and four days of talks over Iran's nuclear program had already gone so far over schedule that the Geneva Intercontinental Hotel had been given over to another event.

    A black tie charity ball was finishing up and singers with an after party band at a bar above the lobby were crooning out the words to a Johnny Cash song - "I fell into a burning ring of fire" - while weary diplomats in nearby conference rooms were trying to polish off the last touches of an accord. Negotiators emerged complaining that the hotel lobby smelled like beer.

    At around 2:00 a.m., U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and counterparts from Britain,China, France, Germany and Russia were brought to a conference room to approve a final text of the agreement which would provide limited relief of sanctions on Iran in return for curbs to its nuclear program.

    At the last minute, with the ministers already gathered in the room, an Iranian official called seeking changes. Negotiators for the global powers refused. Finally the ministers were given the all clear. The deal, a decade in the making, would be done at last.

    Now that the interim deal is signed, talks are far from over as the parties work towards a final accord that would lay to rest all doubts about Iran's nuclear program.

  • Britain's Hague says he discourages Israel from taking any steps to undermine the interim Iran nuclear deal, according to Reuters.
  • Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Arab states, despite their mistrust of Iran, gave a qualified welcome on Monday to Tehran's interim deal with world powers over its disputed nuclear program.

    U.S.-allied Saudi Arabia, locked in a struggle with Iran for influence across the Middle East, is worried that its adversary is secretly seeking atomic weapons, a charge Tehran denies.

    "If there was goodwill, this agreement could represent a preliminary step towards a comprehensive solution to the Iranian nuclear program," Saudi Arabia's cabinet said in a statement carried by state news agency SPA.

  • Israel should avoid taking any action that would undermine the interim nuclear agreement 
    reached between Iran and world powers, Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague said on Monday.

    "We would discourage anybody in the world, including Israel, from taking any steps that would undermine this agreement and we will make that very clear to all concerned," Hague told 

    Hague, who gave an update on the nuclear talks in Geneva, added he had not seen any signs that any country opposed to the agreement would try to disrupt it "in any practical way" but said Britain would be "on its guard".  


  • EU sanctions against Iran could begin easing next month

    European Union sanctions against Iran could be eased as soon as December, officials said Monday in response to a historic interim deal that gives Tehran six months to increase access to its nuclear sites in exchange for keeping the core components of its uranium program.

    The deal, announced in Geneva Saturday, also envisions lifting some of the sanctions that have crippled the country's economy. The sanctions were instituted over fears that Tehran is using its nuclear program to build atomic weapons, something Iran has denied.

    "A Europe-wide decision is necessary" to ease EU sanctions, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told Europe 1 radio. "That's expected in several weeks, for a partial lifting that is targeted, reversible."

    "It could be in December, it could be in January, it depends on how long the legislative process takes," EU foreign affairs spokesman Michael Mann told reporters in Brussels.

    President Barack Obama on Monday defended the agreement, declaring that the United States "cannot close the door on diplomacy."

    Read more at Al Jazeera America

  • In an apparent effort to test Iranian goodwill following a landmark nuclear deal, the United States on Tuesday asked Iran for help in finding retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent Robert Levinson, who disappeared during a business trip to an Iranian island in the Persian Gulf in March 2007.

    "We welcome the assistance of our international partners in this investigation, and we respectfully ask the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to assist us in securing Mr. Levinson's health, welfare, and safe return," the White House said in a statement on Tuesday.

  • Here is an interesting piece from the Christian Science Monitor about how Iranian officials frequently took to Twitter during the recently concluded talks in Geneva. After France decides to make some last minute changes, Iran consults Tehran about how to proceed, but then gets blamed for delays:

    You, as Iran's Foreign Minister
     Mohammad Javad Zarif, are presented the revised document late, as talks are drawing to a close. But the changes mean that you must consult with Tehran, forcing another round of talks: Geneva III.

    Later you are surprised to hear US Secretary of State John Kerry blame Iran for the breakdown, for not being able to accept the deal "at that particular moment," despite "unity" by the P5+1 over their "fair proposal."

    How do you respond? In the old days – and if Iran and the US had not severed diplomatic ties 34 years ago – you might have issued a demarche to Washington, demanding a more accurate accounting.

    But instead you turn to Twitter, as a member of Iran's new presidential administration who has become adept as communicating directly with the outside world through Twitter and Facebook.

    "Mr. Secretary, was it Iran that gutted over half of US draft Thursday night? and publicly commented against it Friday morning?" you tweet, referring to the French role as spoiler. Within minutes, your tweet has been picked up by the wire agencies, and Iran's complaint is "official."

  • With revelations that secret talks between the US and Iran have been happening since 2011, a new bombshell is that the real action probably took place not in Geneva, but in the Omani city of Muscat. Foreign Policy's Hanna Kozlowska explains:

    For the past several weeks, the world's attention has been fixed on a Geneva luxury hotel where Western negotiators and their Iranian counterparts have flitted in and out in search of a deal to end the stand-off over Tehran's nuclear program. But the real action, it turns out, took place 3,000 miles away in the Omani city of Muscat.

    Working through the Sultan Qaboos-bin-Said, the ruler of Oman, U.S. diplomats have secretly huddled with a team of Iranian diplomats since 2011 to carry out bilateral talks aimed at securing an agreement to put the brakes on Iran's nuclear ambitions. While negotiations in Geneva appear to have generated all-important consensus among Western powers, the meat of the agreement looks to have been hammered out in Muscat, far from the prying eyes of the international media gathered in the Swiss city.

    That subplot -- secret negotiations carried out in a little-known Middle Eastern capital known for the production of exceptionally aromatic frankincense -- has added a level of subterfuge to what is already one of the biggest diplomatic developments in recent memory. That a landmark nuclear deal could be worked out in secret is perhaps not surprising but it does cast the spotlight on the man who shepherded the agreement.

  • After Geneva, how will the US and Iran reach a final deal?

    The parties have six months to negotiate a long-term agreement. So Al Jazeera asked a number of analysts of U.S.-Iran relations what the Geneva interim agreement suggests about the prospects for a lasting diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear standoff. Analysts also assess the significance of the direct talks between Washington and Tehran that have been conducted in secret.

    "The terms of the preliminary agreement suggest that Tehran is willing to go a long way to assure its interlocutors that its program will not weaponize," scholar Farideh Farhi told Al Jazeera. "In fact, some of the agreed transparency measures and limitations Iran agreed to were surprising. But the agreement also suggests that Tehran has no intention of abandoning its full-fledged and diversified civilian nuclear program."

    Read more at Al Jazeera America
  • Iran will pursue construction at the Arak heavy-water reactor, Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif was quoted as saying on Wednesday, despite a deal with world powers to shelve a project they fear could yield plutonium for atomic bombs.

    France, one of the six powers that negotiated Sunday's landmark initial accord with Iran to curb its disputed nuclear program, said in response to Zarif's statement that Tehran had to stick to what was agreed in the Geneva talks.

    According to the agreed text, Iran said it would not make "any further advances of its activities" on the Arak reactor, under construction near a western Iranian town with that name.

    "Capacity at the Arak site is not going to increase. It means no new nuclear fuel will be produced and no new installations will be installed, but construction will continue there," Zarif told parliament in translated comments broadcast on Iran's Press TV.


  • The United Arab Emirates foreign minister will visit Iran on Thursday, Iran's state news agency reported, just days after Tehran and world powers struck an interim nuclear accord which has caused Gulf Arab misgivings.

    IRNA said the UAE's Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed would meet Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and other officials. It did not disclose the purpose of the talks.

    Tension between Shia Iran and Sunni Muslim Gulf Arab rulers has been heightened by political turmoil across the Middle East. Gulf Arab ministerial visits to Iran are rare.

    Gulf Arab states gave the interim nuclear agreement a cautious welcome, with Iran's regional arch-foe Saudi Arabia saying that with goodwill it could lead to a wider solution.

    However, the Saudis and their Gulf Arab allies fear the deal will strengthen Iran's regional position at their expense.

  • According to Mohsen Milani from Foreign Affairs, the interim nuclear deal is a 'momentous first step' in the nuclear impasse. "It's not a perfect deal," he says, "Yet it is probably the best that anyone could hope for at this point in history."  Even though critics decried allowing Iran to continue enriching uranium below the five percent mark, it was an unrealistic expectation to think any Iranian leader would abandon it completely, says Milani.

    He continues:

    But perhaps the most important concession is that the P5+1 are allowing Iran to continue enriching uranium below five percent. Iran maintains that this is no concession but is, rather, recognition of the country’s inalienable right under the NPT to enrich uranium on its own soil. For his part, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry insists that the interim agreement does not recognize any such right and that Iran is entitled to limited enrichment for peaceful purposes only if it complies with all provisions of the NPT.

    Kerry's literal reading of the agreement is probably correct. Still, there is no denying that, on substance, Iran wins this round. And it is for precisely that reason that the deal’s opponents decry it. But any Iranian leader who agreed to zero enrichment would be writing his own political obituary. So unless the United States was prepared to attack Iran, occupy it, and change its regime, it was always unrealistic to expect Iran to completely dismantle its nuclear program or agree to zero enrichment. There is thus some basis to the argument that the recent agreement has implicitly recognized Iran as a threshold nuclear power, a power with the knowledge, expertise, infrastructure, and technology to build a bomb.

    In the same way, any new congressional sanctions on Iran would be a deal breaker, since the interim agreement expressly prohibits them. If the United States attempts to impose any now, the negotiations would falter and the existing sanctions regime would crumble. Iran could then resume or even accelerate its enrichment activities. Imposing more sanctions on Iran is thus not a sustainable alternative policy to the current agreement. Perhaps understanding this, the U.S. Congress appears unlikely to impose any new sanctions for the next six months as sensitive negotiations proceed. However, a bipartisan group of senators led by Senator Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) is already preparing contingency sanctions legislation that the group would introduce should the negotiations fail.

    Read more at Foreign Affairs
  • #EU High Rep #Ashton spoke to Turkish FM Davutoglu to debrief him on #Iran deal; will continue to debrief partners on #Iran agreement
  • Iran invites UN inspectors to controversial Arak nuclear facility

    Iran has invited U.N. inspectors to visit its Arak heavy-water production plant on Dec. 8, the first concrete step under a cooperation agreement to clarify concerns about Tehran's disputed nuclear program.

    Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, also said the IAEA was looking into how Sunday's agreement between Iran and six world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear activity could be "put into practice" concerning the U.N. agency's role in verifying the deal.

    The IAEA will expand its monitoring of Iran's uranium enrichment sites and other facilities under the interim accord, reached after marathon talks between Iran and the United States, France, Germany, Britain, Russia and China.

    "This will include the implications for funding and staffing," Amano told the IAEA's 35-nation governing board, according to a copy of his speech.

    Read more at Al Jazeera America
  • World powers reached a nuclear deal with Iran late on November 23. While the deal has been widely praised as a positive first step in international relations with Tehran, Israel's Netanyahu has been a vocal opponent to any nuclear agreement with Iran.

    The implementation of the deal is expected to begin in late December or early January and tough sanctions on Iran will remain. This concludes our running live blog on the Geneva negotiations and subsequent results.
Powered by Platform for Live Reporting, Events, and Social Engagement

Find Al Jazeera America on your TV

Get email updates from Al Jazeera America

Sign up for our weekly newsletter